Report Detail Summary

A defense of the 60/40 strategy

December 20, 2022

A common argument in favor of the 60/40 portfolio is that when stocks have a bad year, bonds usually do better and that helps offset the losses from the stocks. The 60/40 allocation offers a simple and easily implementable way to generate some capital preservation downside protection. It provides a dependable way to invest for the long term. The strategy’s double-digit decline in returns during the first 10 months of 2022 has led many to conclude that there is no place to hide. As a result, they were wondering whether it is time to dump the 60/40 approach. Although the list that follows is not meant to be exhaustive, here are some of the key arguments being made against the 60/40 allocation. • It failed as a capital preservation strategy. It did not protect during the 2022 downdraft. • It did not anticipate the 2022 debacle. • The strategy only works when there is a negative correlation between the two asset classes Was 2022 a Black Swan event for the 60/40 portfolio? Although the decline of each of the asset classes was not a Black Swan event, the magnitude of the decline may be considered one. Here is why. Assuming that the sample average annual returns and standard deviation for the 60/40 portfolio are the result of repeated drawing from a normal distribution, we estimate the likelihood of the 60/40 portfolio return decline to the level experience during 2022 to be 0.29% - a probability that falls well below the range of normal expectation One way to put the 2022 outcome in perspective is to liken the decline to a 300-year flood - a flood that on average occurs once every 300 years. Additionally, makes it a Black Swan is not the fact that the 60/40 portfolio delivered a negative return. What makes is such a unique and unexpected event is the magnitude of the decline. Should investors abandon the 60/40 approach? During the major drawdowns of the last several decades the 60/40 portfolio has posted average declines in the neighborhood of 60% of the decline in stocks. Furthermore, for recoveries lasting more than 1 year, the recovery rate of the 60/40 portfolio has been approximately half of the recovery period of stocks. If, as we believe, the process is not broken, this is not the time to abandon the 60/40 portfolio. Stay the course and expect a faster recovery with the 60/40 portfolio. Yes, 2022 has been a tough year, but as we have argued - the year was akin to a 300-year flood. We look forward to sunny skies and higher ground in the years ahead

You must have an active account to view these reports. You may register for a trial here

Download Complete Report in PDF Format

Download Complete Report in Word Format

Copyright © 2018 La Jolla Economics All Rights Reserved
Legal Disclaimer - Privacy Policy - Contact Information - Login



The ValueTiming™ strategy is based on the assumption that politicians and policymakers have particular views of the world, and that they will in general adopt policy measures that are consistent with these views.


Economic Disturbances and Equilibrium in an Integrated Global Economy

Cocktail Economics: Discovering Investment Truths from Everyday Conversations

Understanding Asset Allocation: An Intuitive Approach to Maximizing Your Portfolio